nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.23 28-33
四象限铅栅模体法对SPECT固有空间分辨力和线性影响研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email): gengjean@163.com;
DOI:
摘要:

目的:探索四象限铅栅方位、计数和源距的四象限铅栅模体法对单光子发射计算机断层成像(SPECT)固有空间分辨力和线性影响,为SPECT质量控制与性能检测方法提供参考。方法:依据国家卫生行业标准《伽玛照相机、单光子发射断层成像设备(SPECT)质量控制检测规范》(WS523-2019),将点源放置在距探头铅栅模体表面1.5、1.7、1.9、2.1和2.3 m(1.5~2.3 m),使用四象限铅栅模体法对北京协和医学院肿瘤医院在用的两台SPECT设备双探头所获取的图像固有空间分辨力和线性进行检测,每个点源位置分别采集安装四象限铅栅模体后的计数(60、100、200、300、500、600和1 000 k),基于目测判断可分辨的四象限铅栅模体最小象限公式定量计算线源图像的半高宽及目测不同象限线性的畸变程度,检测获取两台SPECT设备双探头的固有空间分辨力和固有空间线性,并分析四象限铅栅不同方位图像可分辨最小象限和线性的一致性。结果:源距固定,当四象限铅栅模体采集计数依次为60 k、100 k、200~300 k、500~1 000 k时,获取两台SPECT设备双探头四象限铅栅不同方位图像,四象限铅栅8个方位目测可分辨的最小象限即固有空间分辨力同时依次为4种情况,即四象限铅栅各象限不可分辨、第四象限(6.125 mm)、第三象限(5.25 mm)、第二象限(4.375 mm);固有空间线性均为不可分辨、无线性畸变。四象限铅栅模体检测图像采集计数固定,检测源距1.5~2.3 m时,两台SPECT设备双探头固有空间分辨力和线性检测结果相同。结论:四象限铅栅模体法可完成对SPECT设备固有空间分辨力和线性检测。检测源距在1.5~2.3 m内变化不会对检测结果产生影响。检测时应将每帧图像采集计数≥200 k,铅栅摆放方位优化为正面或反面4个位置。

Abstract:

Objective: To explore effect of four-quadrant lead grid phantom method, including orientation, count rate, and source distance, on the intrinsic spatial resolution and linearity of single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT), so as to take a reference for testing methods of quality control and performance of SPECT. Methods: According to the national health industry standard "Specification for testing of quality control in gamma cameras and single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT)"(WS523-2019), a point source was positioned at 1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1 and 2.3 m(range from 1.5 to 2.3 m) away from the surface of the detector of lead grid phantom. The four-quadrant lead grid phantom method was adopted to detect the intrinsic spatial resolution and linearity of the images that were obtained by dual-detector of two used SPECT equipment at Cancer Hospital of Peking Union Medical College. The counts(60, 100, 200, 300, 500, 600 and 1000 k) were collected respectively at each point source after the four-quadrant lead grid phantom was installed. Based on the minimum quadrant formula of resolvable quadrant of the four-quadrant lead grid phantom that was judged by visual estimation, the full width at half maximum(FWHM) of the line source image, and the degree of linear distortion of different quadrants of visual estimation were quantitatively calculated. The intrinsic spatial resolution and spatial linearity of the dual-detector of two SPECT equipment were detected and obtained, and the consistency of the minimum distinguishable quadrant and linearity in images of different orientations of the four-quadrant lead grid was analyzed. Results: After the source distance was fixed, the images of different orientations of four-quadrant lead grid of dual detector of two SPECT equipment were obtained when the collected counts of the four-quadrant lead grid phantom were respectively 60 k, 100 k, 200-300 k, and 500-1000 k. The distinguishable intrinsic spatial resolutions of simultaneously visual estimation on 8 orientations of fourquadrant lead grid were successively indistinguishable, the 4 th quadrant(6.125 mm), the 3 rd quadrant(5.25 mm), and 2 nd quadrant(4.375 mm). The simultaneously intrinsic spatial linearity were successively, indistinguishable, without linear distortion, without linear distortion, and without linear distortion. The intrinsic spatial resolution and the results of linearity detection in dual-detector of two SPECT equipment were same when the collected count of the detected images of four-quadrant lead grid phantom was fixed, and the detected source distance was from 1.5 m to 2.3 m. Conclusion: The four-quadrant lead grid phantom method can complete the detection for intrinsic spatial resolution and linearity of SPECT equipment. The change of source distance of detection within 1.5 and 2.3 m would not produce effect on the detected results. In detection, the collected count of image of each frame should be ≥200 k, and the placed orientation of lead grid should be optimized at 4 positions of top or bottom.

参考文献

[1]耿建华,陈英茂.核医学成像设备的质量控制标准及中国质量控制现状[J].中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2015,35(1):75-78.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2015.01.021.

[2]曾丽妹,张吴,吴家义,等.肿瘤患者SPECT/CT骨显像巾SUV定量对骨关节炎与骨转移的诊断价值[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2022,1l(2):152-157.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2022.02.015.

[3]Alqahtani MM,Willowson KP,Constable C,et a1.Optimization of 99mTc whole-body SPECT/CT image quality:a phantom study[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2022,23(4):e13528.DOI:10.1002/acm2.13528.

[4]国家卫生健康委员会.伽玛照相机、单光子发射断层成像设备(SPECT)质量控制检测规范:WS523-2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.

[5]洪浩,耿建华,郑容,等.单光子发射断层成像设备固有空间分辨力和线性稳定性检测的比较研究[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(9):10-15.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2020.09.003.

[6]National Electrical Manufactures Association.NEMA standards publication NU 1-2012 Performance measurements of gamma cameras[S].Washington DC:NEMA,2012.

[7]National Electrical Manufacturers Association.NEMA NU1-2018:Performance measurements of Gamma cameras[S].Rosslyn,VA:NEMA,2018.

[8]National Electrical Manufacturers Association.NEMA NU1-2023:Performance measurements of Gamma cameras[S].Rosslyn,VA:NEMA,2023.

[9]洪浩,耿建华,郑容,等.SPECT四象限铅栅法固有空间分辨力和线性稳定性检测的研究[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(6):30-34.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2021.06.009.

[10]International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC 61675-2 Edition 2.0 2015:Radionuclide imaging devicescharacteristics and test conditions Part 2:gamma cameras for planar wholebody and spect imaging[S].IEC,2015.

[11]International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC 63073-1 Edition 1.0 2020:Dedicated radionuclide imaging devices-Characteristics and test conditions-Part 1:Cardiac SPECT[S].IEC,2020.

[12]International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC/TR61948-2 2019:Nuclear medicine instrumentation routine tests Part 2 Scintillation cameras and single photon emission computed tomography imaging[S].IEC,2019.

[13]国家质量监督检验检疫总局.放射性核素成像设备性能和试验规则伽玛照相机:GB/T18989-2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.

[14]International Atomic Energy Agency.Quality assurance for SPECT system[R].Vienna:IAEA,2009.

[15]耿建华,陈英茂,陈盛祖,等.SPECT质量控制标准WS523-2019解读及其检测方法探讨[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(7):7-12.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2020.07.002.

[16]谭展,刘辉,宋颖,等.SPECT设备质控图像分析软件比对结果分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2022,31(5):564-567,572.DOI:10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2022.05.007.

[17]刘鹏,刘杰,李红磊,等.单光子发射断层成像设备(SPECT)质量控制方法探讨[J].中日友好医院学报,2023,37(4):241-244.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0025.2023.04.015.

[18]The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.Acceptance Testing and annual physics survey recommendations for gamma camera,SPECT,and SPECT/CT Systems[R].AAPM Report No.177.2019.

[19]刘辉,谭展,姚杰,等.基于WS523-2019标准对单光子发射断层成像设备进行性能检测及探讨[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2021,41(7):534-538.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2021.07.011.

[20]喻佩,刘辉,宋颖,等.SPECT设备固有均匀性和固有空间线性检测条件的探讨[J].中国辐射卫生,2023,32(6):661-667.DOI:10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2023.06.012.

[21]洪浩,耿建华,陈智文,等.源距变化对单光子发射计算机断层成像设备固有空间分辨力和固有空间线性影响的研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2024,44(12):1049-1055.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20240119-00025.

[22]国家住房和城乡建设部.民用建筑设计统一标准:GB50352-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.

[23]国家卫生健康委员会.放射诊断放射防护要求:GBZ130-2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020.

[24]刘辉,宋颖,程金生.符合线路SPECT设备质量控制及结果分析[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(12):6-9.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2021.12.002.

[25]王猛,金超岭,郑玉民,等.不同采集矩阵与计数对SPECT静态显像的影响[J].中国医学装备,2015,12(9):50-53.DOI:10.3968/j.issn.1672-8270.2015.09.015.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R812

引用信息:

[1]洪浩,李静,王雪鹃,等.四象限铅栅模体法对SPECT固有空间分辨力和线性影响研究[J].中国医学装备,2026,23(01):28-33.

发布时间:

2026-01-25

出版时间:

2026-01-25

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文