nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 12, v.22 24-29
基于PET/CT代谢参数联合临床病理特征的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌预后模型构建与验证
基金项目(Foundation): 河北省医学科学研究课题计划资助(20232029); 保定市科技计划资助(2341ZF260)~~
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

目的:融合正电子发射计算机体层扫描(PET/CT)代谢参数构建临床病理特征的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)多维度预后模型,并验证其在个体化治疗决策中的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性纳入2019年1月至2023年12月期间保定市第一中心医院接受规范化治疗的150例Ⅲ期NSCLC患者的病例资料,采集所有患者PET/CT代谢参数最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)、总病灶糖酵解(TLG)以及表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)等临床病理特征、临床评分及病理分型进行分析。按7∶3比例将150例患者分为训练集(105例)和验证集(45例)。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归筛选关键变量,构建Cox比例风险模型,通过原始数据集Bootstrap重采样(1 000次)进行内部验证,并计算一致性指数(C-index)、校准曲线,采用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。结果:多因素分析显示,全身代谢肿瘤体积(MTVwb)每增加1 cm3,死亡风险升高0.9%(HR=1.009,95%CI:1.003~1.015,P=0.006);NLR≥3.5(HR=2.107,95%CI:1.424~3.119,P=0.001)、CYFRA 21~1≥5.0 ng/ml(HR=1.735,95%CI:1.161~2.594,P=0.012)为独立危险因素,EGFR突变阳性患者死亡风险降低40.1%(HR=0.599,95%CI:0.387~0.928,P=0.022)。模型在训练集和验证集的C-index分别为0.813(95%CI:0.761~0.865)和0.795(95%CI:0.730~0.860),预测模型校准曲线斜率接近1(0.931~1.018),预测模型1年生存预测误差≤1.52%。决策曲线分析显示,当阈值概率为0.2~0.6时,模型净获益值最高达0.469。全身总病灶糖酵解(TLGwb)、程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达及性别均与生存无相关性(P>0.05)。结论:本研究构建的预后模型通过整合代谢负荷与宿主炎性指标,显著提升了Ⅲ期NSCLC生存预测精度,为个体化随访周期制定及治疗策略优化提供了依据。

Abstract:

Objective: To construct a multidimensional prognostic model for stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) by integrating metabolic parameters of positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) with clinicopathological features, and to validate its clinical application value in individualized treatment decision-making. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on case data of 150 patients with stage Ⅲ NSCLC who received standardized treatment at the Baoding NO.1 Central Hospital, Hebei Province, between January 2019 and December 2023. The PET/CT metabolic parameters [maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume(MTV), total lesion glycolysis(TLG)], and clinicopathological features [epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutation, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), cytokeratin 19 fragment(CYFRA21-1) ], clinical scores, and pathological subtypes of all patients were collected. Patients were randomly divided into a training set(n=105) and a validation set(n=45) as a 7:3 ratio. Key variables were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO) regression. A Cox proportional hazards model was subsequently constructed. Internal validation was performed via Bootstrap resampling(1,000 iterations) from original data set. Model performance was assessed by calculating the concordance index(C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis(DCA). Results: Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: death's risk increased 0.9% with increasing per 1 cm3 whole-body metabolic tumor volume(MTVwb) [hazard ratio(HR)=1.009, 95% confidence interval(CI): 1.003-1.015, P=0.006], NLR ≥3.5(HR=2.107, 95%CI: 1.424-3.119, P=0.001), and CYFRA21-1 level ≥5.0 ng/ml(HR=1.735, 95%CI: 1.161-2.594, P=0.012). Conversely, patients with positive EGFR mutations demonstrated a 40.1% reduction in mortality risk(HR=0.599, 95%CI: 0.387-0.928, P=0.022). The C-index values of model were respectively 0.813(95%CI: 0.761-0.865) in the training set and 0.795(95%CI: 0.730-0.860) in the validation set. The slope of the calibration curve for the predictive model was close to 1(range: 0.931-1.018). The prediction error of 1-year survival was ≤1.52%. Decision curve analysis indicated that the highest net benefit value of the model reached to 0.469 when the range of threshold probability was 0.2-0.6. The expression of whole-body total lesion glycolysis(TLGwb) and programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) did not appear correlation with gender and survival(P>0.05). Conclusion: The prognostic model that is constructed by this study, which integrates metabolic burden and host inflammatory markers, can significantly enhance predictive accuracy for survival of patients at stage Ⅲ NSCLC. It can provide valuable basis for formulating individualized follow-up period and optimizing therapeutic strategies.

参考文献

[1]Haratake N,Ozawa H,Morimoto Y,et al.MUC1-C Is a Common driver of acquired osimertinib resistance in NSCLC[J].J Thorac Oncol,2024,19(3):434-450.DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.10.017.

[2]Tian J,Shi Z,Zhao L,et al.Revolutionizing NSCLC treatment:immunotherapy strategies for EGFRTKIs resistance[J].Clin Respir J,2024,18(12):e70037.DOI:10.1111/crj.70037.

[3]Liu SY,Feng WN,Wu YL.Immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC:answering the question or questioning the answer?[J].Cancer Cell,2024,42(5):727-731.DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.04.005.

[4]陈祥迪,李淑晓,沈妍,等.18F-FDG PET/CT摄取值及血清载脂蛋白A1、谷胱甘肽对不同运动障碍亚型帕金森病的预测价值[J].中国医学装备,2024,21(4):75-79.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2024.04.015.

[5]李明,李运达,曲智锋,等.基于飞行时间信息的PET/CT自由智在扫描技术的验证分析[J].中国医学装备,2023,20(1):2-7.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2023.01.001.

[6]马宇彤,刘明,张廷杰,等.呼吸门控对肝高代谢灶PET/CT图像质量的改善及应用[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(7):35-40.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2022.07.008.

[7]张利改,唱凯,吴宇,等.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞亚群比值在非小细胞肺癌临床分期及病理分型中的应用价值研究[J].国际检验医学杂志,2024,45(14):1675-1681,1686.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2024.14.003.

[8]肖平,潘海,马晴,等.初诊Ⅳ期肺癌患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与营养不良风险的相关性分析[J].中国肺癌杂志,2024,27(3):193-198.DOI:10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.06.

[9]方平,王根和,左刚.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、C-反应蛋白与白蛋白比值对接受P D-1抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的预测作用[J].临床肺科杂志,2022,27(12):1798-1803.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2022.12.004.

[10]孙琦,文洽先,王庆华,等.PET/CT定量参数联合血液学指标对免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期肺癌患者预后的预测价值[J].天津医药,2022,50(4):399-403.DOI:10.11958/20211611.

[11]谭小飞,党军,叶真言,等.基线18F-FDG PET/CT图像参数对非小细胞肺癌患者治疗后远处转移的预测价值研究[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2024,37(2):121-131.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2024.02.004.

[12]张旭霞,翟亚楠,张皓,等.18F-FDG PET/CT全身肿瘤代谢体积——非小细胞肺癌患者的独立预后因素[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2018,44(6):20-25.DOI:10.13885/j.issn.1000-2812.2018.06.004.

[13]袁燕玲,唐武兵,童丽华,等.预后营养指数与淋巴细胞-单核细胞比值、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值对非小细胞肺癌治疗评价及预后分析[J].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志,2023,10(2):262-269.DOI:10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2023.02.017.

[14]张舒婷,高超.半乳糖凝集素3、中性粒细胞计数与中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值在非小细胞肺癌中的临床意义[J].徐州医科大学学报,2019,39(6):411-415.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2019.06.05.

[15]刘维鹏,朱青山,冯连杰,等.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、白细胞介素-17A及转化生长因子-β对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者发生放射性肺炎的诊断价值[J].癌症进展,2022,20(3):282-285.DOI:10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2022.20.03.18.

[16]李向敏,张兰兰,毛志远,等.中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值、血小板-淋巴细胞比值对预测晚期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗疗效及预后的意义[J].空军医学杂志,2020,36(4):317-321.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3402.2020.04.014.

[17]周宗正,潘刚,乙楠,等.CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR水平与晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的关系[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志,2024,16(6):1019-1023.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6929.2024.06.008.

[18]何彩云,谢东德,潘海强,等.血清CYFRA21-1、SCCA、Pro-GRP、CEA、PCT、IL-6联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床价值分析[J].中南医学科学杂志,2024,52(6):950-953.DOI:10.15972/j.cnki.43-1509/r.2024.06.018.

[19]胡媛春,蔡晓玉.非小细胞肺癌患者血清中CYFRA21-1、N S E表达及临床意义[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2024,25(4):472-476.DOI:10.11713/j.issn.1009-4822.2024.04.009.

[20]黄登亮,张耀刚,侯静,等.乳酸上调非小细胞肺癌细胞中总胆固醇水平的机制研究[J].解放军医学院学报,2023,44(3):248-253,260.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2023.03.008.

[21]杨晶晶,殷丽霞,段婷,等.胃癌组织中高表达ATP5A1与患者术后的不良预后和肿瘤细胞的糖代谢有关[J].南方医科大学学报,2024,44(5):974-980.DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.05.20.

[22]周文丽,缪明永.乳酸脱氢酶与肿瘤免疫代谢研究进展[J].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志,2020,7(4):396-401,489.DOI:10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2020.04.004.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R734.2

引用信息:

[1]张建阳,宋会民,田晓媛,等.基于PET/CT代谢参数联合临床病理特征的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌预后模型构建与验证[J].中国医学装备,2025,22(12):24-29.

基金信息:

河北省医学科学研究课题计划资助(20232029); 保定市科技计划资助(2341ZF260)~~

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文